Archive for the 'User' Category

Careless Design From Google and Apple?

Today two of my favorite companies decided to tell me how little they care about me and other customers. In my opinion, not bothering users with useless information is highly related to the general design of a website and usability. Keep in mind that a good website should make users’ life easier trying to make processes simple and short and without disturbing users when they are doing other activities. In another example of how design, usability and marketing mix each other I will show you the emails I got from Google and Apple. 

The first mail came from Google, it was actually coming from "noreplay" and the subject was "New Optional Benchmarking Feature Available in Google Analytics". That was it, no link to get farther information, no content in the email. At all. Then I went to my Analytics account, there was an item for the new feature in the menu but nothing inside. OK, this could be a new feature that is coming but the way they announced it was a little bit careless (maybe arrogant?).

Don’t get me wrong, I do really admire Google. They usually make good marketing, they design good processes and they care about usability. And that’s why the following email makes me angry:

Google Mail Example

 

The second email making me angry today comes from the Apple iTunes Store (Germany). Yeah, I love my iPod and I love Apple products but lets have a look at the following email. Apple decided today that they wanted to send me spam, OK, it was not unsolicited email because I signed up for the newsletter, but the information on it was as useless and aggressive as spam could be.

The "iTunes alert me" newsletter should recommend me music I might like. Today, Apple sent me an email offering me an album I already have, one that I listen to very often and one that has been released 4 years ago. I am sure Apple already knows all that, so why bothering me with so useless information?

iTunes Alert Me Mail Example

 

Popularity: 24% [?]

Accessibility Quick Tip 3: Text Equivalents for Multimedia

If possible, a text equivalent should be provided for all visual information in a website, like video, music and interactive graphics. There are several reasons why a description text should be included in a website design.

 

- Old browsers might not be able to display some multimedia files

- Some browsers might not have the necessary plugins and the user might not be able to update it (or might not want to)

- Impaired people could have problems interacting with multimedia

- Visually impaired people could need a text version of the multimedia file to be read by web readers

- Not every body has a high speed internet connection to download multimedia files

 

Why should you care?  Improving usability helps everybody surfing your website, not only the impaired ones. Imagine that you trying to teach something through multimedia content, like a video; giving text explanation of what is going on in that video could improve the understanding of the idea you are trying to teach.

 

The BBC makes a good job providing an advance text to tell users what’s in the video. Unfortunately the BBC does not give an explanation about the video itself, if the user is not able to play the video no content would be delivered at all.

BBC Video Example

 

Most Cnet News videos and photo slides have more than decent descriptions of what’s going on there.

Cnet Video Example With Explanation Text

 

An image or video says a lot, but you could add much more value to that if you provide equivalent text for that media. At the end, if the user is able to see that media anyways, the text will increase the understanding of the message you are trying to deliver.

Popularity: 15% [?]

« Previous PageNext Page »