This is a compilation of digital camera interfaces. Specially, I want to show the differences among button designs. This is not a product review and I don’t want to criticize too much, just to show them to see the differences. In order to properly judge the cameras we should see how the people behave when using them, thing we did we a few models only.

We spent some time in a huge shop touching cameras and observing other people doing the same. That gave us a first insight on the different perceptions about these devices but, of course, a shop is not the “natural” environment where people take pictures, so the context was not totally taken into account.

At last, we did interview people about cameras and we observed them taking pictures and touching the things. The conclusion: there is room for improvement on digital camera designs.

Here there are some comments and pictures of different compact cameras.

Rollei

It is easy to see the symbols on buttons, the contrast is good but having several functions working on one button could be confusing. From Rollei, we liked the way it navigates through pictures (unfortunately I can not show you that).

Having less buttons could make the camera look simple, but this graphic interface show us that this is not always true.

Here we noticed that it is very difficult to see the labels on buttons, the contrast is very bad.

Kodak

One function for each button could be a good approach. I like the knob to turn the camera on and off, it’s impossible to confuse it with the shooting button.

The “Share” button might have good functionality, but honestly I don’t know what it does. What we discovered interviewing elderly people is that this group avoids pressing on buttons they don’t know what they are for.

Casio

This one has some buttons on the top that are almost impossible to see while taking pictures. “BS” seems to be something only Casio uses, we don’t know the meaning.

Painted buttons have great contrast! Unfortunately, it is very difficult to see what’s written on the other ones.

It seems that Casio likes wheels. Unfortunately, these wheels do not behave like real wheels.

Sony

There are some contrast issues here (on the buttons), but the most impressive things are the wheels. The one on the top is a real wheel the user can turn, the one on the bottom can not be turned.

These two models (above, below) got a touch screen. This is a risky approach, success depends mostly on how well the graphic interface is designed. For the one below, graving it properly could be quite complicated.  This model got lots of functionality, buttons and wheels!

Nikon

Flash position is good here, it’s difficult to place the finger on it.

The wheel could be an issue here and the buttons on top of the camera could not be seen when needed.

Some of the buttons in this camera seem to be part of this brand’s lexicon.

Panasonic

Painted buttons look great but the other ones have very bad contrast, I can imagine this being a big issue using the camera outdoors and even more for the elderly.

I wonder if labels like “AF/AE” are understandable to everybody. Should we carry the manual with us?

Canon

On many Canon cameras the wheel looks and works like a wheel, main function of it is to navigate through saved pictures. I like it a lot. Interesting design, but using buttons that don’t really look like buttons could be dangerous.

This model goes in the right direction. The wheel is great. Unfortunately the graphic interface is not that simple.

We noticed that symbols on this model are difficult to understand for many people, specially the ones on the top wheel.

Credits: some comments and thoughts on cameras were developed with help of Nora Gonzalez Dwyer.